Tax Management India. Com
                            Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals News SMS Articles Highlights
        Home        
 
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax Section Wise 2015 TMI Tri Income Tax - Tri 2015 (6) TMI Income Tax - 2015 TMI 2015 TMI Tri 2015 (6) TMI Tri Income Tax - 2015 TMI Tri Income Tax - 2015 (6) TMI Tri This
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Income Tax - Tribunal - Case Laws

Showing 1 to 20 of 554 Records

  • 2015 (6) TMI 1160

    Assessability of leave and licence income received - to be assessed as profit and gains of business or as income from other sources - Held that - As discussed the director s report dated 26/08/2003 with respect to licence fee with American Express Bank, which came to an end on 31/03/2003 after which a new licence agreement was entered into by the assessee with British Deputy High Commission, ratio laid down in Sultan Brother Pvt. Ltd. (1963 (12) ....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1158

    Capital gain on tenancy rights transfer - Cost with reference to certain modes of acquisition - AO denied the indexation in view of the provisions of section 55(2)(a) - cost of acquisition of tenancy rights is to be treated as nil, if the assessee has not paid any purchase price for the acquisition of the same - Date of acquisition of tenancy rights by the father of the assessee - Held that - Since the tenancy rights have been dealt with/discusse....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1157

    Addition of advances - Held that - As confirmed that cheques have been handed over to the appellant only as a measure of security for supply of scrap or for the purpose of obtaining the loan, but all of them have denied having obtained any loan from the appellant. The statements given by those people remains uncontroverted. AO is justified in entertaining doubt that the appellant is engaged in the business of money lending and the cheques have be....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1156

    Additions u/s 69A - unexplained money in the bank accounts - corroborative evidence to indicate that the earlier withdrawn money was re-deposited in the bank accounts - Held that - We find force in the contention of the learned counsel that in the earlier years 2014 (10) TMI 975 - ITAT PANAJI the Tribunal has decided all these issues in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Respectfully following the order of the Coordinate Bench, appea....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1153

    Revision u/s 263 - wrong allowability of claim of tax credit under section 90 - residential status of assessee - Held that - When the order of the AO was set aside in respect of issue is relating to the claim of tax credit under section 90 AO went altogether into a different footing and changed the status of the assessee as non-resident. CIT has remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer specifically with regard to the claim of tax credit ....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1151

    Accrual of interest - Addition being interest on year marked funds (i.e. Development Fund & Infrastructure Development Fund) - assessment as income - Held that - CIT(A) has given too much of emphasis on how the monies are invested in a current account with District Co-operative Bank or in fixed deposits elsewhere. That is not material in the present context. What is material is that income from interest on these funds does not accrue to the a....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1149

    Accumulation of income for application to the extent of 15% of net receipts u/s. 11(1)(a) - allowance at 15% of gross receipts or net receipts i.e.; gross receipts less Revenue expenditure - Held that - The assessee is to be allowed accumulation of income for application for charitable purposes u/s. 11(1)(a) of the Act at 15% of gross receipts following the decision in the case of Bai Sonabai Hirji Agiary Trust v ITO (2004 (9) TMI 300 - ITAT BOMB....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1147

    Disallowance of Contribution towards Gratuity & Superannuation Fund and provision for bad debts - Held that - We find that it is held by Hon ble Allahabad High Court force in assessee s own case for A. Y. 2009-10 that it is an undisputed fact that the assessee s enjoying the benefit of section 80P (2) and the deduction is not dependent on the quantification of claim made by the assessee and therefore if there is any addition made in the incom....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1142

    Validity of notice after case being transferred - Reopening of assessment - file transferred by ITO Ward-26(4) to ITO Ward - 26(3) noticing jurisdiction over the appellant - Held that - ITO Ward-26(3), New Delhi had proceeded with the framing assessment without issuing fresh notice u/s 148. It means that ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi had no valid jurisdiction over the appellant, at the time of issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act. In such circumstances,....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1130

    Exemption u/s 11 & 12 - Held that - The income of the assessee should be assessed as per section 11 & 12 of the Act and if the assessee is able to establish that 85% or more of the income of the assessee has been utilized for the purpose of assessee institution then the income of the assessee should be exempt. Because there is no finding of the authorities below on this aspect of the matter, we restore the matter back to the file of the A....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1129

    Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - received 1 million Euros for forgoing the right to sue/initiate legal proceedings for breach of pre-emptive right to purchase shares - decision on nature of the said receipt - Revenue is of the opinion that the said receipt constitutes revenue receipt against the assessee s claim that it falls in capital zone - AO taxed the same u/s 28(va) - Held that - We find there is no dispute before us so far as disclosure of informat....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1128

    Recomputation of the value of closing work-in-progress by attributing interest proportion to the work-in-progress - Held that - The issue arising in the present appeal is identical to the issue before the Tribunal in assessment years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. The AO in the year under appeal, in turn, following the decision made in assessment years 2002-2003, 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 had recomputed the valuation of work-in-progress at the close of t....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1127

    Exemption u/s 10(10C) Held that - Decision of the I.T.A.T., Chandigarh Bench rendered in the case of Shri Bikram Jit Passi (2012 (11) TMI 214 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH) is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case. Respectfully following the above order of the Tribunal, allow the claim of the assessee holding that the authorities below were not justified in disallowing the amount of ₹ 5 lacs under section 10(10C) of the Act. - Decided i....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1126

    Disallowance made in respect of provision for warranty - Held that - The issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Tribunal in assessee s own case, no provision can be recognized. Liability is defined as a present obligation arising from past events, the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow from the enterprise of resources embodying economic benefits. A past event that leads to a present obligat....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1124

    Disallowance of Travelling Expenditure - Held that - The assessee has submitted the details, according to which foreign travel expenses were subjected to FBT and since foreign travel expenses have already been subjected to FBT, the same could not be disallowed under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. See Om Intercontinental vs. ACIT 2013 (4) TMI 793 - ITAT MUMBAI . Therefore we delete the addition and appeal filed by the assessee is allowed........ + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1122

    Adjustment in the arm s length price(ALP) of international transaction - Held that - The Assessee is a wholly owned subsidiary of Beceem Communications Inc. USA. The Assessee rendered software development services to its holding company thus companies functionally dissimilar with that of assessee need to be deselected from final list of comparable. - Deduction u/s.10A computation - Held that - Taking into consideration the decision rendered by th....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1120

    Revision u/s 263 - Assessing Officer did not consider the issue of eligibility of additional depreciation on windmill and the same has resulted in loss of revenue - assessment order passed by AO under the provisions of section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A - Held that - AO did not have jurisdiction to the make addition on the impugned issue as the same is not based on seized material. Such contention has been rejected only on the ground that there are confl....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1119

    Deemed dividend addition made u/s. 2(22)(e) - loan taken from the company and company compensated by way of interest paid by the assessee on loan - Held that - As decided in Pradip Kumar Malhotra case 2011 (8) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT the authorities below erred in law in treating the advance given by the Company to the assessee by way of compensation to the assessee for keeping his property as mortgage on behalf of the company to reap the be....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1118

    Rectification of mistake - mistake in filling item No.43, which was taken into account by processing the return and the income of the assessee was processed at nil in place of a loss of ₹ 20,37,162/- - Held that - The mistake, as is claimed by the assessee to be apparent from the record would fall within sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of the Explanation as the figure of nil stated against column No.43 would be inconsistent with the other entr....... + More


  • 2015 (6) TMI 1116

    Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Deduction claimed u/s. 80I and 80IA on manufacturing and sale of Gutka, Treating sales tax incentive as capital receipt - Held that - We are of the considered view that since the first two issues on which the penalty has been levied u/s. 271(1)(c) involves substantial question of law, therefore, no penalty is leviable thereon. The Hon ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Nayan Builders and Developers ....... + More


1........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.