2017 (8) TMI 1280 - AT - Service Tax

Taxability - promotion of business of ICD - services by CHA to clients - appellant got ex gratia payment from the ICD through which cargo were shipped - Held that - when the incentives for promotion of the business of the ICD is paid and it was pre-decided then the same is chargeable to service tax - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant.

Summary

Issues:
Service tax liability on ex gratia payment received by a Customs House Agent for export and import of cargo.

Analysis:
The case involved an appeal against an order passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise (Appeals), Jaipur-II, regarding the service tax liability on ex gratia payment received by a Customs House Agent for export and import of cargo. The appellant received ex gratia payment from the Inland Container Depot (ICD) through which cargo was shipped. The department considered this amount as subject to service tax liability, leading to the appellant filing the appeals.

During the hearing, both parties presented their arguments. It was observed that the ICD provided incentives to the appellant based on the number of containers handled, and this incentive was pre-decided and known to the appellant. The payment was not ad hoc but was pre-fixed based on the quantum of containers handled. The Tribunal noted that the incentives were given for the promotion of the ICD's business and were chargeable to service tax. The Tribunal distinguished the case laws cited by the appellant, stating that they were not relevant to incentives on containers.

After considering the arguments and examining the records, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Consequently, the Tribunal sustained the order passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise (Appeals), Jaipur-II, along with the reasons provided therein. As a result, all the appeals filed by the appellant were dismissed. The decision was dictated and pronounced in the open court, bringing the matter to a close.