Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2022 (11) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (11) TMI 992 - HC - Income TaxRecognition/identification of income liable to tax - accounting system adopted by the assessee -expenditure with reference to the sub-contract with Ircon Ltd.treated contract receipt or the right to contract receipt - obligation to follow mercantile system of accounting, record expenditure, contract receipt etc - whether bills certified as relating to the work completed during the year be brought to tax in the assessment year 1986-87? - HELD THAT:- For the view in the particular facts and circumstances of this case and upon considering the findings recorded by CIT(Appeals) and Tribunal, we are of the view that the argument of Revenue that mercantile system of accounting should have been adopted for the work executed in Iraq, does not arise and the assessee had rightly adopted completed contract system for the work under execution in Iraq in the contemporary period. The answer to second question is dependent on the findings we have recorded in the first question. Once this Court holds that the completed contract method adopted by the assessee in the current facts and circumstances is right, the bills certified as relating to work completed cannot be recognised as receipts and brought to tax in the Assessment Year 1986-87. The question that mercantile system of accounting should be directed would curtail the discretion available to the assessee - we answer the points in favour of assessee and against the Revenue. Work as executed or the progress bills were presented and approved - enforceable right in the assessee to receive payment - HELD THAT:- From the findings recorded, it is not brought to our notice that the bills certified are gone that far in getting approval from the Iraq Government and an enforceable right in the Assessment Year. The bills are stated as certified. It is definitely an enforceable right in the realm of contract. The assessee since is subjected to vagaries and uncertainties of fluctuation, preferred to have completed contract method for the entire project. The effect of these transaction, recognition of revenue etc would arise either upon completion of the contract and/or rescission of contract, other foreseen and unseen eventualities, that means, arising in the course of the execution of the contract. By keeping in view the finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal, we answer the issue by holding that the bills certified in the case on hand having regard to the deferred payment agreement entered by the assessee did not create an enforceable right even in the subsequent Assessment Year. The point is answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
|