Bookmarks   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login  
Tax Management India .com   
   TMI - Tax Management India. Com   
Addition u/s 68 - the loan which has been returned to the respective creditors cannot be taxed in the hands of assessee as its income - Tri    *    CENVAT credit - dumpers/ tippers will be in the nature of inputs for providing Supply of tangible goods services & not capital goods – Tri    *    Export of Red Sanders wood by Government of Andhra Pradesh & Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) - Revision of quantity allocation to Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and extension of time for export by Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and DRI    *    Taxability of collection of development fee from the passengers – operational, management and development of airport - it cannot be said that the amount so collected is by way of service charge. - not taxable - Tri    *    Cenvat credit - Since lubricants are not falling under the negative list of goods mentioned in the definition clause, credit cannot be denied to the appellant - Tri    *    Expenditure on Cost Guard day function & seminar - whether allowable expenditure u/s. 37(i) - Held Yes - The expenditure has been incurred towards discharge of corporate social responsibility - Tri    *    TDS u/s 194C - non tds on Vehicle / dumper Hire Charges - No contract, either verbal or written, is entered into with the owners / drivers in these cases of purely temporary transporting arrangements - No disallowance - Tri    *    Industrial gala sold - taxation as STCG or LTCG - The entire payment as per the agreement was in fact made before financial year 1998-99. Occupation certificate was also issued on 10.03.1998 - the keys were taken back by the assessee on 01.01.2005 - sale of the property in the year 2005 has to be treated as sale of long-term capital assets and gain has to be assessed as long-term-capital-gain - Tri    *    Transfer pricing adjustment - the TPO was required to give reasons for discarding the CUP method qua each of the transactions as all the 12 international transactions entered into by the appellant were distinct. - HC    *    Reopening of assessment - at the time of issuing notice, it is not incumbent upon the AO to prove conclusively that there is escapement of income - Tri    *    Doctrine of substantial compliance    *    Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of '7.35 per cent Government Stock, 2024’, Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of ‘New 10 year Government Stock, 2026’, Auction for Sale (Re-issue) ‘7.73 per cent Government Stock, 2034’ and Auction for Sale (Issue) of ‘8.13 per cent Government Stock, 2045’    *    Interaction of the Indian Members of the India – US CEO Forum with Commerce and Industry Minister    *    Bilateral Meeting between Commerce & Industry Minister and Secretary of State for International Trade, UK    *    COMPENSATION UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 – SOME ISSUES    *    Travelling expenses incurred outside India by on duty employee whether taxable?    *    CENVAT CREDIT ON CERTIFIED COPY OF BILL OF MISC. CHARGES ON FINALIZATION OF BOE    *    Captive consuption to be shown in ER-1 Return filed through ACES system -reg    *    should i buy machinery after gst or before gst which will be benefit for me    *    After GST - Machinery booking on commission    *    Applicability Of Service tax on Liquidated Damages    *    Dr. Liam Fox, U.K. Secretary of State for International Trade calls on the Union Finance Minister Shri Arun Jaitley: Both the leaders call for forging deeper trade and investment arrangements between the two countries
Home News Commentaries / Editorials Month 3 2009 2009 (3)
← Previous Next →

Applicability of Service Tax on GTA service where goods are delivered in self owned vehicles - Whether the truck owners are liable to pay service tax when they send their own goods using their own trucks?

March 2, 2009
  • News

This issue has been addressed by the honorable CESTAT in the matter of MSPL LTD. Versus CCE, BELGAUM reported in 2009 -TMI - 32448 - CESTAT, BANGALORE

The facts of the case are as under:

The appellants are actually manufacturers of Oxygen and Nitrogen. They transport the cylinders to their buyers in their own vehicle and collect the transportation charges. Revenue proceeded against them on the ground that they are providing the services of "Goods Transport Agency". Therefore, they are liable to discharge the service tax on the freight charges collected by them from their buyers. The Original Authority in his order confirmed the demand of service tax on the appellants. He demanded an amount of Rs. 12,11,140/- on  the ground that the appellants are a Goods Transport Agency rendering taxable service. He demanded interest under Section 75. Penalties were also imposed under Section 76, 77 & 78 of the Finance Act. The appellants were aggrieved over the order of the lower authority. Hence, they approached the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) after examining the issue in the light of law set aside the original order, remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to determine the liability of the appellants in the light of provisions of Section 68 (2) of the Finance Act read with Rule 2 (1) (d) (v) of Service Tax Rules, 1994.

Appellant submits the following arguments (in brief)

  1. The appellants use their own vehicles. They are the owners of the vehicle and they are not the Goods Transport Agency. …………………….. The appellants being the owners of the motor vehicles or goods carriage cannot be said to be their own agents providing the services of GTA to themselves as customers in relation to transportation of goods by road in goods carriage.
  2. The CBEC vide Circular No. 95/6/2007-ST dated 11.06.2007 has clarified in para 1, the nature and scope of the service of GTA.
  3. Speech of the Union Minister of Finance while presenting the Union Finance Bill 2004-05 - "58 services have been brought under the net so far. I propose to add some more this year. ………………… I may clarify that there is no intention to levy service tax on truck owners or truck operators. …..."

After hearing the argument of both the parties, CESTAT has ruled that:

On a very careful consideration of the entire issue, we find that the appellants transport the goods in their own vehicle to the buyer. The buyer is a person who actually pays the freight. It is very clear in terms of Rule 2 (1) (d) (v) that the liability to pay service tax is cast on the person who pays the freight. In this case the person who pays the freight is the buyer.

Therefore, the appellant has no liability to pay the service tax.


For full text of judgment - visit

MSPL LTD. Versus CCE, BELGAUM reported in 2009 -TMI - 32448 - CESTAT, BANGALORE



← Previous Next →
what is new what is new

Advanced Search

Latest Updates




More Options


|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map || ||

© [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version