-
Income Tax:
The provisions contained in section 11(2) do not in any manner restrict the operation of section 11(1) of the IT Act and the accumulated income, which was less than 15 per cent of the total income.... - AT
-
Income Tax:
Exemption u/s 10(23C) – Merely on the ground that petitioner is not recognized by the UGC or any Board constituted by the Government of India for imparting formal education in the field of western music and that petitioner is not itself awarding any certificate or degree to the students, it cannot be said that it does not qualify to be an educational institution... - HC
-
Income Tax:
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Though he is an individual and he is not expected to maintain accounts showing the current assets and liabilities, income etc., his explanation that he was innocent and he was not aware of the legal requirement cannot be accepted.... - HC
-
Income Tax:
The payment of interest under Section 201(1A) is not penal. Even though default was unintentional, still assessee would be deemed as “assessee in default..... - HC
-
Income Tax:
Income from House property - the arrears of rent received in the assessment year 2000-01 could not be spread over the previous years, i.e., 1996-97 to 1999-2000.... - HC
-
Income Tax:
Provision of liability made for expenditure to be incurred in removal of encroachments in and around the technical area of the Airport - held as revenue expenditure.... - HC
-
Income Tax:
Assessee has right to adopt an accounting system of his choice. - Interference is permissible if the accounting system adopted is contrary to the prescribed accounting standards etc. under Section 145/145A of the Act..... - HC
-
Income Tax:
TDS u/s 194J or 195 - global management services and VSAT uplinking - reimbursement of the expenses - no tax at source was deductible and the provisions of Section 40(a)(i) of the Act were not attracted. .... - HC
-
Income Tax:
Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) u/s 35DDA - merely because payment of more than Rs. 5 lakhs is made would not mean that the schemes are not in conformity with Rule 2BA and the provisions of Section 10(10A) of the Act.... - HC
-
Income Tax:
Capital gains – payment made by the assessee for vacancy of the property had a link with the sale of property and, therefore, was entitled for set off against sale consideration.... - HC
-
Income Tax:
Unpaid liabilities cannot be added as the assessee’s income under Section 41(1) merely because they remained unpaid for a sufficiently long time.... - HC
-
Income Tax:
The Revenue's principal objection is that the activities of the Trust, which are limited to running a School, is being run on commercial lines, so that there is no question of it being charitable - Decided in favor of revenue..... - AT
-
Income Tax:
Business of civil contracts for construction of roads, highways etc. - not engaged in the business of developing any infrastructure facility – Not eligible for deduction u/s 80IB .... - AT
-
Income Tax:
The owners entered into land development agreement with the developer while retaining the ownership, assigned certain rights – Held as transfer u/s. 2(47)(v) of the I.T. Act..... - AT
-
Income Tax:
TDS u/s 194H - Discount offered to Collection Centres for testing of samples - No TDS.... - AT
-
Customs:
Refund of 4% Additional Duty of Customs (4% CVD) - 'Cost Accountants' in addition to 'Chartered Accountants' authorized to issue certificate.
-
Customs:
Import of good (in commercial quantity) through banafide baggage is not permissible - It cannot be constituted as bonafide baggage... - CGOVT
-
FEMA:
External Commercial Borrowings (ECB). - Cir. No. 64 Dated: January 5, 2012
-
Indian Laws:
Clarification on Interest Rates on Small Savings Schemes.
-
Service Tax:
Refund of service tax to include education cess - Education Cess is levied and collected as percentage of service tax, when and wherever service tax is NIL by virtue of exemption, Education Cess would also be NIL. - refund of cess can not be rejected.... - AT
-
Service Tax:
Cenvat credit on inputs services - the insurance policy to cover loss of profit would come within the expression for 'activities relating to business' in the inclusive limp of the definition of input services.... - AT
-
Service Tax:
Cenvat credit on inputs - Security services are area specific services - the specific exclusion salt pan from the definition of the term factory which definition is applicable to the Cenvat Rules, the security services which are area specific cannot be treated as input services.... - AT
-
Service Tax:
Service provided by visa facilitator in the form of assistance to individuals who intend to travel abroad, directly, does not fall under any taxable service under Section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994. .... - AT
-
Service Tax:
Since the car is owned by an individual (director) and not by the appellant, the services rendered in relation to the car cannot be considered as input services for the appellants company..... - AT
-
Service Tax:
Job for pre-commissioning - civil construction work performed does not fall under the category of commissioning and installation..... - AT
-
Central Excise:
Manufacturer claimed nil rate of duty on the ground that the same are manufactured without the aid of power - Water is lifted to the water tank with the aid of power and the water so lifted is further used in the manufacture of final product - held that the goods are manufactured with the aid of power .... - AT
-
Central Excise:
Duty paying documents - cenvat credit is not available on photocopy of the bill of entry when the same has been taken without certifying by the Asstt. Commissioner about loss of the original triplicate copy of the bill of entry.... - AT
-
Central Excise:
Classification of pleasure vessel – under Rule 3(c) when the goods cannot be classified by reference to Rule 3 (a) & (b) they shall be classified under heading which occurs last in the numerical order among those which equally merit consideration .... - AT
-
Central Excise:
Suo moto re-credit after reversal of cenvat credit - suo moto refund of excess or twice paid duty cannot be taken and all types of refund claims to have been filed under Section 11B .... - AT
-
Central Excise:
Rule 6(3)(b) of CCR are not applicable in the case of arising inevitable waste or bye-product fully exempt from duty .... - AT
-
Central Excise:
CE - Payment of duty on the directions of the preventive officers held as paid under protest – period of limitation of one year is not applicable .... - AT
-
Central Excise:
Refund of Cenvat credit - Rule 5 of CCR - in absence of any confirmed demand, reduction from the refund claim is not proper.... - AT
-
Central Excise:
since the Appellant could not have carried on his business without sending the samples to its dealers and prospective buyers and also without transmitting documents, cenvat credit of service tax paid on courier services allowed..... - AT
-
Central Excise:
CE - electricity consumption is not the criteria to determine output level..... - AT
-
Central Excise:
Amends Notification No. 3/2006-Central Excise - Effective Rate of Duty on goods of Chapter 1 to Chapter 25. - Ntf. No. 1/2012-Central Excise Dated: January 3, 2012
-
Income Tax
-
2011 (12) TMI 142
Imposition of interest u/s 201(1A) – Imposition of penalty u/s 221 - Assessee in default - assessee under a bona-fide belief not deducted/not paid the tax at source in respect of the reimbursements for expenses to its employees – Held that:- The payment of interest under Section 201(1A) is not penal. Even though default was unintentional, still assessee would be deemed as “assessee in default. There is, therefore, no question of waiver of such interest on the basis that the default was not intentional or on any other basis. The question of ‘good and sufficient reasons’ only arises on consideration of proviso to Section 201(1) which negate the possibility of imposition of penalty under Section 221 if the Assessing Officer is satisfied that the person liable had good and sufficient reasons to not deduct and pay the tax in question. Thus, in view of proviso to Section 201(1) no penalty can be imposed on the assessee under Section 221 . The matter is remanded to to the assessing officer for the limited purpose of computing the exact quantum of default and the interest payable under Section 201(1A) of the said Act. - Decided partly in favor of Revenue.
-
Service Tax
-
2011 (12) TMI 141
Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 - liability for period prior to 18.04.06 - Held that:- The order of the Commissioner revising the order of the original authority to demand service tax for the period prior to 17.04.2006 on the recipient of the services in India in the facts and circumstances are not justified in view of the judgment of the High Court in the case of Indian National Shipowners Association Vs. Union of India (2008 - TMI - 32013 - High Court Of Bombay) as conveyed by the Board to the field formations vide Circular dated 26.09.2011 - Decided in favor of assessee.
-
2011 (12) TMI 138
Power of the Commissioner (Appeals) to remand - export of IT software - refund claim under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 read with Notification No. 5/2006 dated 14.3.2006 on input services used in the export of output services – Held that:- The Commissioner (Appeals) has examined and found nexus between the input services (viz manpower recruitment, commercial training, management consultancy etc) and the output services. In effect, the Commissioner (Appeals) has not remitted any issue on merits to be decided by the original authority. It is basically for quantification purposes based on the Chartered Accountant's certificate as envisaged in the Board's Circular dated 19.1.2010. - Decided against the Revenue.
-
2011 (12) TMI 136
CENVAT Credit of Service Tax on rent-a-cab service - rent-a-cab service was not exclusively used in relation to manufacture – period involved April 2005 to October 2009 - Held that:- The issue is only of interpretation of law. However, the relevant decisions regarding limitation as well as admissibility of credit or otherwise, were not cited before lower authority and therefore, the matter is remanded to original adjudicating authority, who shall consider the issue afresh in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court/High Court/Tribunal and also the provisions of law.
-
Central Excise
-
2011 (12) TMI 137
Manufacture of turpentine oil and rosin – assessee claimed nil rate of duty on the ground that the same are manufactured without the aid of power and also demands are time-barred - Held that:- Water is lifted to the water tank with the aid of power and the water so lifted is further used in the manufacture of final product, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in CCE, Nagpur vs. Gurukripa Resins Pvt. Ltd. (2011 - TMI - 204457 - Supreme Court Of India) it is held that the goods are manufactured with the aid of power. Hence turpentine oil, is classifiable under Heading 3805.11 and rosin is classifiable under Heading 3806.11 of the Tariff. Further it is held that the demand beyond the normal period of limitation as provided under the provisions of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act are not sustainable hence set aside. Consequently, the demand for the normal period is confirmed and the Revenue's appeal is allowed to that extent.
