Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Service Tax This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

service tax on construction of labour quaters for tea industries, Service Tax

Issue Id: - 111278
Dated: 27-12-2016
By:- ramkishore gupta

service tax on construction of labour quaters for tea industries


  • Contents

Dear Sir

Please let me know if service tax is chargable on contsruction of

01. Ring well with plinth (including material)

02. over thaching kacha house

03. Constructon of laterine with septic tank

04. Construction of Labour quater

Also let me know is it make any difference if the same is constructed for Govt authority or for Tea Industries unit

Thanks

Ram Kishore Gupta

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 11 of 11 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 27-12-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Service Tax is chargeable. Exemption for Govt. construction is available for only those contracts which were executed before 1.3.15.


2 Dated: 27-12-2016
By:- ramkishore gupta

Sir will all the 4 points mentioned above will be taxable if the same is constructed for tea industries labour or any exemption can be claimed on the same


3 Dated: 27-12-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Any construction which is temporary and not meant for sale for example Serial No.2 is not taxable.


4 Dated: 28-12-2016
By:- ramkishore gupta

Thanks sir for the reply. It will be very helpful to me if you can give the section reference under service tax for exemption for construction of temperory construction not for sale


5 Dated: 28-12-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Over thatching katcha house is not meant for sale. Hence it is out of definition of Construction of Residential Complex and Commercial or Industrial Construction. Read Explanation to erstwhile Section 65 (105)(zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. These Sections are still valid for statistical purpose. In other words, we can say for convenience of clarification of the concept or definition. Otherwise Service Tax law is very much clear, if any service which does not fetch consideration that is free service and ST cannot be charged. Consideration is a must for qualifying the definition of 'Service' in terms of Section 65 B (44) of the Finance Act. For example ; When 100 flats are to be constructed, first of all the builder constructs temporary accommodation for the staff, that is to be demolished after the construction of 100 flats. That temporary accommodation or Over Thatched Katcha House is not intended for sale. Hence not taxable.


6 Dated: 28-12-2016
By:- ramkishore gupta

Thanks very much Sir for giving your time to my queries.One more query Sir :

Contract taken for plantation of Tree / cutting of leaves for tea industries is that exempted or taxable under service tax .If yes in what ration it is exempted and if fully exempted please give section reference

Thanks


7 Dated: 28-12-2016
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

In my view the said service is taxable.


8 Dated: 29-12-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Yes. I agree with Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani, Sir. Also see my article on this very issue published under the head, 'Article' in September, 15. Go to my profile and click 'Article'.


9 Dated: 29-12-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Regarding non-taxability of temporary accommodation (Not intended for sale), also read Notification No. 26/12-ST (Serial No.12), the phrase, 'intended for sale' exists there. It implies that even after 1.7.12, if the condition of 'intended for sale' is not fulfilled, no ST is leviable. Over-thatched Katcha House is not intended for sale.


10 Dated: 29-12-2016
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

Sri Kasturi Sir, i read your article long back and based on that i had replied now to this query. The article is very informative and nice written.

I would like to enrich my knowledge with more such articles of yours.


11 Dated: 29-12-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sir,

My reply was meant for the querist. Anyhow, it is O.K.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates