Tax Management India. Com
                        Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...

Category of Documents

TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals SMS News Articles
Highlights
D. Forum
What's New

Share:      

        Home        
 
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

← Previous Next →

IN BANKING JEWEL LOAN - APPRAISER FEE RELATED, Goods and Services Tax - GST

Issue Id: - 115628
Dated: 6-11-2019
By:- VEL MURUGAN
IN BANKING JEWEL LOAN - APPRAISER FEE RELATED

  • Contents

SIR

IM WORKING AS A GOLD APPRAISER IN TAMILNADU STATE APEX CO-OPERATIVE BANK

MY WORK IS COMMISSION BASIS

BANK COLLECT APPRAISER CHARGES FROM CUSTOMERS.

THAT CHARGES( APPRAISER FEE) IS TAXABLE UNDER GST OR NOT

FOR THE LAST FEW YEARS THEY COLLECT GST.

THAT IS CORRECT OR NOT

ANOTHER ? ON MY SERVICE IS TAXABLE UNDER GST OR NOT

BANK COLLECT ₹ 100( INCLUDE GST) FROM CUSTOMER THEN MY SHARE 80% BANK SHARE 20%

BUT I RECEIVED ONLY 67% . THIS IS CORRECT OR NOT

PLEASE REPLY FOR MY PROBLEM

THANK YOU SIR

G VELMURUGAN

Post Reply

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 2 of 2 Records

1 Dated: 8-11-2019
By:- KASTURI SETHI

The bank is not on right track. Suppose you are 'A' (Service Provider), Bank is service receiver as 'B' and ultimate consumer is 'C'. C is B's customer and not A's. A has nothing to do with C. C is your customer's customer. B is playing the role of intermediary.

Since A is supplying service to B, A is to collect GST from B and deposit with the Govt. It is A's duty and here the situation reverse. Why B is making payment to you after deduction of GST ? It is not TDS or TCS. An amount of ₹ 80/- includes GST and you get ₹ 67/- after deduction of GST of ₹ 13/- (@18%). Your service is taxable. You can avail threshold exemption of ₹ 20 lakhs.

Also go through the following case law pertaining to Service Tax regime.

2008 (12) S.T.R. 376 (Tri. - Chennai) = 2008 (7) TMI 147 - CESTAT, CHENNAI PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., TRICHY


2 Dated: 8-11-2019
By:- KASTURI SETHI

The amount received from the bank should not be called 'commission'.


1

Post Reply

← Previous Next →

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || Database || Members || Refer Us ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.
|| Blog || Site Map - Recent || Site Map || ||