Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2004 (6) TMI 250

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... books of accounts as advances received from various brick kiln owners and accordingly, confirmations from some of the brick kiln owners with whom the assessee was having trading dealings, were called. According to the AO, confirmation to the tune of Rs. 1,05,900 was not filed and so the same was treated as unexplained. The assessee then filed revised return on 30th April, 1996 in which the abovesaid amount of Rs. 1,05,900 was shown as surrendered because he could not contact these parties, as detailed in the order of the AO, from whom the assessee received these advances totalling to Rs. 1,05,900. The Department issued notice under s. 148 of the Act and accordingly assessment was completed on the revised return which was filed earlier to t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ended before the CIT(A) that since this amount has been surrendered by the assessee with a view to avoid further proceedings against the assessee, so it would not lead to any inference that the assessee was guilty of concealment of income. The assessee also contended before the CIT(A) that before levying penalty, clear-cut charge has to be framed against the assessee for concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income by the AO, whereas no specific charge has been framed against the assessee for which penalty has been levied. So the AO was not justified in levying the penalty. 2.2 After considering these submissions of the assessee and placing reliance on the various decisions, as mentioned in the order of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nalty and accordingly the penalty levied by the AO both on the facts and on this legal ground are ordered to be cancelled." 2.3 Before us, learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue placing reliance on the reasoning given in the order of the AO, submitted that in this case, the AO by placing reliance on the decision of the apex Court reported in G.C. Agarwal vs. CIT (1991) 95 CTR (SC) 257 : (1990) 186 ITR 571 (SC), has rightly imposed the impugned penalty amount on the assessee because in this case, once the assessee has not been able to produce confirmation from some of the brick kiln owners, whose advances amounted to Rs. 1,05,900, the assessee revised his return of income and surrendered an amount of Rs. 1,05,900 and so the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o be arrived at by the AO during the course of any proceedings under the Act, which would mean the assessment proceedings, without which, the very jurisdiction to initiate the penalty proceedings is not conferred on the assessing authority by reference to cl. (c) of sub-s. (1) of s. 271 of the IT Act, 1961" Held "Dismissing the application to direct reference, that the Tribunal had found that the assessment order did not record the satisfaction as warranted by s. 271 for initiating proceedings. The Tribunal was justified in cancelling the penalty. No question of law arose from its order." (ii) In the case of CIT vs. Super Metal Re-rollers (P) Ltd. (2003) 185 CTR (Del) 349 : (2004) 265 ITR 82 (Del), their Lordships while observing t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e there is a defect in the assumption of jurisdiction, it cannot be cured." Held "Dismissing the appeal that the reason assigned by the Tribunal for cancellation of the penalty were legally correct and the order passed by it did not give rise to any question of law, much less a substantial question of law." 2.5 We have considered the rival submissions, perused the records and carefully gone through the orders of the tax authorities below. 2.6 In the instant case, we have gone through the entire assessment order passed by the AO and find that during the course of entire assessment proceedings, the AO has not recorded his satisfaction that the assessee has concealed particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates