Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2005 (8) TMI 298

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nly 600 shares and 1000 shares. Payments have been received from the brokers only in instalments over a period of 6-7 months. It is true that when transactions are through cheques, it looks like real transaction but authorities are permitted to look behind the transactions and find out the motive behind transactions. Generally, it is expected that apparent is real but it is not sacrosanct. If facts and circumstances so warrant that it does not accord with the test of human probabilities, transactions have been held to be non-genuine. It is highly improbable that share price of a worthless company can go from Rs. 3 to Rs. 55 in a short span of time, Mere payment by cheque and receipt by cheque does not render a transaction genuine. Capital g .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o Rs. 20,36,700 resulting into net capital gain of Rs. 48,995. The AO on perusal of record further observed that in the case of a family member of the same assessee Shri D.C. Maini, in the same assessment year, similar exercise has been done by the assessee wherein a long-term capital loss of Rs. 11,59,066 had been incurred on account of sale of gold jewellery declared under the VDIS and short-term capital gain of Rs. 11,75,100 resulting into a net gain of Rs. 16,034. On going through the nature of transactions, the AO doubted the genuineness of the short-term capital gain in the case of the assessee and he made further inquiry that during the year assessee had purchased 45,000 shares of M/s Ankur International Ltd. at varying rates from Rs .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... learned CIT(A) deleted the addition on the ground that both the brokers from whom the shares have been purchased and sold were called under s. 131 by the AO. Both have confirmed the sale and purchase of said shares Other aspect of the facts and circumstances raised by the AO was not discussed by the CIT(A) in his order. 4. In appeal before us, the learned Departmental Representative contended that it is highly improbable that shares of a company go up so high in few months' time. The learned Departmental Representative took us through various pages of the assessment order and the paper book wherein sale bill of the shares with the said M/s S.K. Sharma Co. were also filed. The learned Departmental Representative pointed out that shares .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y. They go up and down as per sentiments prevailing at that time. To controvert the argument of the learned Departmental Representative, he argued that share prices are quoted at Jaipur Stock Exchange and were quoted on the relevant date of sale at the same price on which shares were sold to M/s S.K. Sharma Co. However, the learned Departmental Representative controverted his argument by saying that volume of transactions on the relevant dates is only 600 shares on 9th Feb., 1998 and 1000 shares on 23rd March, 1998 whereas number of shares involved in the transactions with S.K Sharma Co. are 45000 shares. 6. After hearing the rival submissions, going through the orders of authorities below and paper book, we find that M/s Ankur Internationa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ry. If that story is found to be unbelievable as the Tribunal has found and in our opinion, rightly that the decisions remains that the consideration for the sale proceeded from the assessee and therefore, it must be assumed to be his money. It is surprising that the High Court has found fault with the ITO for not examining the wife and the father-in-law of the assessee for proving the Department's case. All that we can say is that the High Court has ignored the facts of life. It is unfortunate that the High Court has taken a superficial view of the onus that lay on the Department. 7. The learned CIT(A) only got swayed by the issuance of notice by the AO under s. 131 to both the brokers from whom shares were purchased and sold and came .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates