Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2006 (6) TMI 145

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssee is an individual who has been employed as a managing director with Caltex Lubricants India Ltd (hereinafter referred as the "company"). The assessee is a foreign national, and was hitherto employed with the Caltex Group outsideIndiaalso. The tax on the salaries received by the assessee from the company was borne by the said Company. The assessee claimed exemption from including such amount in his income in terms of the provisions of s. 10(5B) of the Act. The claim of the assessee was that he was a technician and was employed inIndiain which such specialized knowledge and experience was utilised. The AO held that the assessee was not entitled to exemption under s. 10(5B) of the Act on the ground-(a) that the assessee was appointed as a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ogi appearing on behalf of the appellant has reiterated the stand of the assessee as taken before the lower authorities. The learned counsel, at the outset referred to the provisions of s. 10(5B) of the Act and submitted that the interpretation made out by the lower authorities is not tenable. According to him, what the section requires is that an assessee while seeking exemption should qualify to be a 'technician' employed inIndia. According to him, for the purpose of s. 10(5B) the Explanation thereto provides the meaning of the word "technician" The said Explanation provides that a "technician" means a person having specialized knowledge and experience in constructional or manufacturing operations or such like fields as mentioned therein. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... irector was overall in-charge of the employer-company and, therefore, it was not a case where he was performing the role of technician. He has justified the reasoning taken by the lower authorities to deny the exemption by pointing out that the job of a managing director does not require the use of technical skills exclusively whereas a "technician" is to be understood as a person having experience and specialization in technical field alone. 6. We have considered the rival submissions carefully. The fact situation, which is undisputed, is as follows. The assessee-individual is a chemical engineer and has been working with Caltex Group in various countries for over a period of 25 years. A brief summary of the assessee's career can be seen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y much before the lower authorities and the same has also been noted by the IT authorities. In the above background the assessee sought exemption from the taxation under s. 10(5B) of the Act. Sec. 10(5B) provides for exemption from tax in relation to the tax liability of an assessee-individual which is met by his employer. The eligibility criteria under s. 10(5B) of the Act requires the claimant to be a "technician". The section explains a "technician" to mean a person having specialized knowledge and experience in the fields referred to in the sub-section or such other fields as the Central Government may specify and who is employed inIndiain a capacity in which such specialized knowledge and experience are actually utilised. The issue is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s in the company, which is evident from his job profile. The mere fact that he was also an executive and administrative head would not disentitle him from qualifying as a "technician" within the meaning of s. 10(5B) of the Act. Ostensibly, there is nothing in the language of s. 10(5B) which would suggest that the 'technician' referred to in the said section is to be understood as one who exclusively uses his technical knowledge only in his employment inIndia. There is no bar on claiming exemption by an assessee who uses his specialized knowledge and experience in the specified technical field and also discharges other duties in carrying out his employment. The stand of the Revenue, in our view, is, untenable. Therefore, on the basis of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates