Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1989 (12) TMI 140

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion of unquoted equity shares owned by the assessees of M/s. R.S. Rekhchand Mohota Spinning and Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bombay and Shree Vinay Waste Reclamations Pvt. Ltd., Hinganghat. The two companies are other than investment companies and Managing Agency Companies. 3. The department has been valuing the shares of these companies in the hands of the assessees on the yield basis right-up to the assessment year 1984-85. Earlier, the Wealth-tax Officer, disagreeing with the stand of the assessees valued these shares by the break-up method as laid down in rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957. On appeal the learned A.A.C. of Wealth-tax following the order dated 7-4-1982 of the Tribunal in W.T.A. Nos. 254, 255 256 (Nag.)/81, directed th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case where a company had ceased to be a going concern and was not showing any profits. In the case in hand although the two companies were not showing assessable profits, yet they were going concerns and had disclosed commercial and maintainable profits and there was, therefore, no justification for applying the break-up value method. In support of his contention the learned counsel for the assessees, relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CWT v. Mahadeo Jalan [1972] 86 ITR 621. In this connection, the learned counsel for the assessees also referred to the valuation of the shares of the two companies made by two different valuers, namely, Shri K.C. Agrawal Co., Chartered Accountants and Shri Shantilal Chandaliya C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sees' own cases for the assessment years 1985-86 and 1986-87. For this purpose reliance was placed on the same ruling of the Madras High Court in L. G. Ramamurthi's case. As regards the mandatory nature of the rule 1D, the learned counsel for the assessees countered the argument of the learned Departmental Representative by referring to the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Smt. Kusumben D. Mahadevia v. CWT [1980] 124 ITR 799. 7. Now, we have before us the order of the Nagpur Bench of the Tribunal in the assessees' own cases for the immediately preceding assessment, years, that is 1985-86 and 1986-87. In that order dated 24-6-1988, the Tribunal has upheld the contention of the department and directed the valuation of these .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... firms of K.C. Agrawal Co. and Shantilal Chandaliya Co. The learned counsel for the assessees contended that since such valuation reports were not before the earlier Bench and since they have been submitted before the present Bench, such submission constitutes a change in facts and circumstances and provides a goods and valid basis for reviewing the earlier decision of the Bench. We have given our careful and anxious thought to this aspect of the matter, but find ourselves not persuaded to accept this contention of the learned counsel for the assessees. It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the assessees that the facts and circumstances concerning the nature of the business of the two companies, the prospects of profitability and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f the W.T. Act and the rules made thereunder, more particularly rule 1D is only to estimate the price of an asset which in the opinion of the Assessing Officer it would fetch if sold in the open market on the valuation date. In the case in hand, the difference between the value estimated by the break-up value method and that by yield method is so astronomical that it renders the yield method totally inappropriate. Besides this, such astronomical difference between the two values constitutes such exceptional circumstances as is referred to in the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Mahadeo Jalan. We, therefore, hold that on the basis of the facts established before us, no case has been made out for our taking a view different from t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates