1988 (3) TMI 206

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt (3)]. - Smt. Malini Sud, Advocate for the appellant and Shri K.P. Singh, S.D.R. and Shri L.C. Chakraborty, J.D.R. for the respondent heard and papers perused. 2. The question for decision in these appeals is whether Nickel Catalyst, Activated Carbon and Phosphoric Acid are raw materials or components for the purpose of exemption under Notification No. 201/79, dated 4.6.1979 after its amen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n the four decisions referred to in para 6 of the decision. 1. 1987 (28) E.L.T. 529 (Tribunal) CCE Allahabad v. Hindustan Aluminium Corporation, Mirzapur. 2. 1985 (21) E.L.T. 901 (Tribunal) CCE, Bhubaneshwar v. Titaghur Paper Mills. 3. 1985 (22) E.L.T. 163 (Tribunal) SRB Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. v. C.C.E. 4. 1985 (22) E.L.T. 594 (Tribunal) Andhra Sugars Ltd. v. Collector of Central .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X