2010 (4) TMI 334

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or the Appellant. Shri Vijay Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T) (for the Bench)]. - Heard both sides at length. The dispute in this case relates to the imported cables for which the appellants are claiming exemption under Notification No. 21/02- Cus., dated 1-3-2002- S. No. 340, which reads as under :- 340     8544.41    .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ogue which indicates 300 Volts which is much higher than 80 Volts prescribed in the notification. 3. Shri L.P. Asthana, learned Advocate for the appellants argues that there is a clarification from the supplier to the effect that 300 Volts is the break down voltage. However, we find that the department has obtained a report from the Electronics Test and Development Centre, Jaipur established tind .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X