Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

COMMISSIONER OF CUS. & CENTRAL EXCISE Versus D.S.M SUGAR MILLS LTD.

2009 (11) TMI 445 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Penalty- Whether the respondents are liable to pay the penalty under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944? Held that- issue debatable and still debate is going on. No question of penalty arises. - 8 of 2007 - Dated:- 25-11-2009 - Prakash Krishna a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

substantial question of law has been sought to be raised in the appeal :- (i) Whether the respondents are liable to pay the penalty under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944? 2. Heard Sri Subodh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri S. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ble to welding electrodes, it consequently 1evied penalty. The quantum of penalty was reduced by the first Appellate Authority and entire penalty has been deleted by the Tribunal. 4. It is also not disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version