TMI Blog2009 (11) TMI 454X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d to appellants in accordance with law. Held that – absence of evidence of affixing order in original on doors of assessee or notice board of authority concerned. Thus prima facie case made out for waiver of pre-deposit. - ST/670-671/2009 - 1645-1646/2009, - Dated:- 12-11-2009 - Shri P. Karthikeyan, Member (T) REPRESENTED BY: Shri Aswath Nararanan C.A. , for the Appellant. Shri M. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Appeals) found that the department had complied with the procedure for service of the order as per Section 37C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and therefore, the appellants could not have claimed that the order of the original authority had not been served on them. The appellants seek waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the demands of Service tax, interest and penalties adjudged in the i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... peals) had rejected the appeal on the ground of time bar in accordance with law. The stay applications and the appeals filed deserved to be dismissed. 6. 1 have carefully considered the case records and the submissions made by both sides. From the orders of the original authority, it is not possible to make out the activity engaged in by the appellants during the material period, in respect of w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
