TMI Blog2010 (11) TMI 26X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... st, the High Court should have directed the Assessing Officer to grant an opportunity to the assessee to cross-examine the concerned witness - 9756-9757 of 2010 /1736-1737 of 2009 - - - Dated:- 19-11-2010 - S.H. Kapadia C.J.I., K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar, JJ R.P. Bhatt, Sr. Adv. Bhakti Pasrija, Adv. Rachana Joshi Issar, Adv., B.V. Balaram Das, Adv., for the Appellant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... are of the view that the High Court should not have quashed the assessment proceedings vide impugned order. 4. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside. 5. Liberty is granted to the assessee to move CIT (Appeals). It is made clear that the assessee herein will move the CIT (Appeals) within a period of six weeks from today. 6. Accordingly, these civil appeals stand disposed of. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|