Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1993 (9) TMI 218

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he appeals disposed of by the Collector (Appeals), only the above appellant s appeals are taken for disposal. 4. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of parts and components of Material Handling Equipments falling under sub-heading 8431.00 of the Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and were also holding Central Excise Licence. They had filed classification lists claiming exemption from payment of duty under Notification No. 175/86-C.E., dated 1-3-1986 as amended and were also availing Modvat facility on inputs. It was later found that they were processing/manufacturing excisable goods on job work basis from the inputs/raw materials supplied by M/s. Elecon on payment of duty at the concessional rate of 10%. Thus, they were .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uld be returned to the supplier, in this case M/s. Elecon Engineering after carrying out the required .processing, without payment of duty. The ultimate duty payment would be done by M/s. Elecon Engineering. He has held that the entire scheme of Rule 57F(2) does not contemplate payment of any duty by the job worker/processor on such processed inputs, while returning the same to the assessee. He has held that such processed inputs are required to be returned to the supplier under duplicate challan without payment of duty. The ld. Collector has observed that a similar benefit has been provided under Notification No. 214/86-C.E., dated 25-3-1986, which exempts the specified goods manufactured in a factory on job work basis, out of the raw mate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ld. Advocate, for the appellants and Shri K.K. Dutta, ld. JDR for the Revenue. 7. Shri Dave submitted that the job workers were doing work on principal to principal basis. The raw materials received from M/s. Elecon Engineering were subjected to process of manufacture and the intermediate product that emerged was dutiable, as it was clearly covered in the tariff entry and the same was required to suffer excise duty. It is his plea that Rule 57F(2) did not lay down any provision for non-payment of duty by the job-worker by availing the concessional rate of duty. Rule 57F(2) also did not grant any exemption for the goods manufactured by the job worker. Although Notification No. 214/86 did provide for availing the benefit of exemption yet i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ourt in Special Civil Application No. 7222/1991 by their judgment dated 29-10-1991 and that they have approved the findings given by the Tribunal in the case of Facit Asia Ltd. ld. Advocate also referred to Rules 13 and 56B to support his arguments inasmuch as to say that in these rules, it has been made obvious, that goods removed should be brought back without payment of duties. As Rule 57F(2) was independent rule, there was no mention of bringing back the goods without payment of duty. 8. Shri K.K. Dutta, ld. JDR reiterated the findings of the lower authorities. 9. We have carefully considered the pleas made by both the sides and have perused the findings of the lower authorities and the citations referred before us. We fully agr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... duty had been paid thereon. We also find force in this submission. We clearly notice that Rule 57F(2) does not envisage return of inputs after completion of processing resulting in a semi-finished goods or intermediate goods without payment of duty. Therefore, the job-workers in these cases, admittedly are independent manufacturers and they are utilising the benefit of SSI exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E., dated 1-3-1986 as amended. They are, therefore, entitled to enjoy the concessional benefit of the said notification. As rightly held by the Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Application No. 7222/91, they cannot be compelled to utilise the benefit under Notification No. 214/86. The finding of the Gujarat High Court is noted b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates