1995 (12) TMI 156

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : R. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. The appeal has been brought by the Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. A/233/95, dated 8-6-1995 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune, allowing the appeal of the Respondents. 2. The only issue involved in this case is whether time limit prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 would be applicabl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... under Section 11B can be applicable. 5. After hearing both the sides, we are unable to agree with the contention raised by Shri K.M. Mondal, the ld. SDR. Any demand confirmed by the lower adjudicating authority, if challenged by way of appeal, as provided under the law, the appeal itself could be construed to be a protest against demand. Moreover, as per the statutory requirements, if the amoun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X