9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (5) TMI 252X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ents. [Order per : T. P. Nambiar, Member (J)]. - The present appeal is directed against the Central Excise duty demand of Rs. 6,44,893.48 on 8956.854 MTs of Cement Clinker manufactured and removed by the appellants from 1986-87 to 1987-88. The main ground on which the appellant was not allowed the benefit of Notification No. 119/86-C.E., dated 1-3-1986 was that they have not followed the Chapte ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aluk, Tumkur Dist. on 14-4-1987 found that the said factory is engaged in the manufacture and clearance of clinkers falling [in] Chapter sub-heading No. 2502.10 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They were receiving raw materials like lime stone, coke breeze and clay from M/s. Nandi Cements holders of licence L-4 No. 1/Cement/86 situated in the same survey No. and premises and after converting th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n such circumstances the claim for the benefit of Notification No. 119/86 should have been given to the appellants. 4. We have heard the learned JDR for the department Shri Arulswamy who stated that the appellants have not complied with the Chapter X procedure and they are not entitled for the same. 5. The learned advocate Shri G. Sampath relied on the following decision to justify th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Chapter X procedure is not sufficient to deny the benefit to the appellants as has been held in the abovesaid decisions which are relied by learned advocate. 7. In the present case from the allegations in the Show Cause Notice itself it is very clear the goods were received by the appellant and after the Job work is done they were sent back to M/s. Nandi Cements and what is required is v ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
