TMI Blog2001 (1) TMI 278X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. This is an appeal against denial of renewal of CHA licence of the appellants. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellants applied for renewal of CHA licence. It was found that the appellants had not complied with the requirement of Public Notice No. 33/96, dated 5-7-96. This Public Notice was issued by the Collectorate in exercise ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Chauhan, ld. Advocate submits that the facts are stated in the appeal. He submits that the Commissioner had discriminated against the appellant inasmuch as the norms set out by the Public Notice No. 33/96, dated 5-7-96 were discriminatory in nature inasmuch as the norms fixed by the Bombay Commissionerate as well as other Commissionerates are less than those fixed by Delhi Customs. He submits that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ar year, he should not have been deprived of his livelihood. He, therefore, prays that the appeal may be allowed. 4. Shri Rajeev Tandon, ld. SDR opposes the request and submits that the norms are fixed by each Commissionerate; that the Customs House Agents Regulation 12(2)(a) empowers the Commissioner to set out the norms for CHA licence. Ld. SDR submits that when performance of the appellant wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
