9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (5) TMI 839X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dy, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The appellants were issued a show cause notice proposing to confirm the demand of duty of Rs. 1,39,07,158.00 as differential duty by denying the benefit of Notification No. 57/93-C.E., dated 28-2-1993. While adjudicating the said show cause notice, the Assistant Commissioner confirmed the demand of duty of Rs. 1,15,89,289. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and he remitted the matter to the Assistant Commissioner for adjudging the case afresh. The appellants have filed an appeal against the said Order of the Commissioner (Appeals). 3. After hearing both sides, we find that the entire demand of duty confirmed against the appellants have already been set aside by the Tribunal, vide Order dated 10-5-2000, by extend ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
