TMI Blog1999 (12) TMI 817X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .S. Nijjar, J. On an application filed by the petitioners, by order dated December 7,1999, the petition was permitted to be withdrawn. The facts relating to the conduct of the company are narrated in the order dated December 7, 1999 and they need not be repeated here. The official liquidator has submitted the report dated December 13,1999. In this report, it is stated that the order dated Decem ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the official liquidator's report is treated as a review petition, this court would be sitting in appeal over its own order which is not permissible in law. It is submitted by Mr. Diwan that as soon as the judge signs the order, he becomes functus officio and even if a glaring illegality or error is pointed out in the judgment, the court is helpless in correcting the same. According to learned cou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... titioner to withdraw the petition as he would not have the consent of all the creditors or the contributories. In view of the above, I find that the order dated December 7, 1999, was wholly without jurisdiction. The petitioner could not have been permitted to withdraw the petition. Apart from this, it is the case of the company that the company is registered before the BIFR. The facts leading up ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
