9911796707
TMI Blog2004 (8) TMI 482X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. 2. Appellants filed these appeals against the imposition of penalties of Rs. 30,000/- on M/s. Bundelkhand Alloys (P) Ltd., penalty of Rs. 15,000/- on Shri Dheer Singh, Authorised Signatory of M/s. Bundelkhand Alloys (P) Ltd., and Rs. 25,000/- on Shri Saurav Jain, Director of M/s. Bundelkhand Alloys (P) Ltd. 3. The brief facts of the cas ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Revenue is that the goods were seized on 30-9-2000, and the appellants failed to produced any duty paying document under which the goods were cleared to M/s. Maharani Traders. The proprietor of M/s. Maharani Traders, Shri Sanjay Kumar Sharma, in his statement admitted that original buyers copy and Duplicate Transport copy of the invoices covering the seized goods were given to him at the eveni ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... harma, in his statement specifically mentioned that invoices are covering the consignment in dispute were received at the evening of 2-10-2000 through a person of M/s. Bundelkhand Alloys (P) Ltd. Shri Sanjay Kumar Sharma also mentioned in his statement that he issued Challans at the direction of M/s. Bundelkhand Alloys (P) Ltd. In these circumstances, I find no merit in the contention of the appel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
