2006 (3) TMI 377

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.K. Abichandani, President]. In this case the appeal has been preferred against the final finding to the extent that it has been held that imports had been made from the subject countries below their normal value. Admittedly, in the final findings no duty was recommended since it was held that the domestic industry had not suffered m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ch led to non-imposition of any anti-dumping duty, will have no relevance in any future proceedings as apprehended by the learned Counsel for the appellant, because those proceedings, if at all undertaken under the provisions of Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, will be in respect of a different period of investigation for which fresh determinations will have to be made, as per the rules .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X