9911796707
TMI Blog2006 (5) TMI 324X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . - Heard ld. SDR. 2. The notice issued to the respondent was received back with the postal remarks left without any address. In these circumstances, the appeal is being taken up in absence of the respondent. 3. The Revenue challenged the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the demand of duty was reduced from Rs. 1,75,616/- to Rs. 69,246.37. 4. The cont ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... le for duty. The Commissioner (Appeals) without any evidence accepted that calculations and reduced the amount of duty. The contention is that as the present respondents themselves gave the calculation and quantity of the yarn which was cleared on cones and that was accepted by the adjudicating authority, while confirming the demand. Hence there is no merit in the argument of the present responden ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Rs. 1,52,709.70 + Addl. TOT Rs. 22,906.45) rounded to Rs. 1,75,616.00, which is liable to be confirmed against the party. The party is also in agreement with these figures. I observe that an amount of Rs. 65,883.35 has already been deposited by the party under TR-6 challan No. 6 dated 18-1-95 and thus an amount of Rs. 1,09,732/- still remains payable." 6. Thereafter before Commissioner (Appe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
