TMI Blog2006 (7) TMI 506X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Appearing in support of the miscellaneous application for rectification of mistake in the Tribunal Order No. A/65-70/WZB/06/C-II/EB, dated 10-1-2006 [2006 (199) E.L.T. 241 (Tri.)], Shri Naresh Thacker, ld. Advocate submits that in though time was granted to the appellants to file the submissions by 30-11-2005, the same has not been filed, whereas the fact is that written submissions were filed on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rent on the face of the records, merely because the written arguments, which were, in any case, also advanced at the time of hearing and taken note of by the Bench, were not considered. 3. However, to be fair to the appellants, we have seen the written submission filed on 29-11-2005 and find that the issue raised therein have been taken note of by the Tribunal in the said order. The Tribunal has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t be foisted upon them and non fulfillment of export obligation cannot be alleged. We do not agree with the above contention of the Ld. Advocate, the expression use in the notification and production of aquaculture products and export in out of India have to be read in conjunction and as one expression. If the two terms production and export have to be read as separate meaning thereby that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
