2008 (6) TMI 478

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. -  This stay application is directed against the confirmation of demand of Rs. 48,79,451/- and imposition of penalty of equivalent amount. 2. Considered the submissions made by both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this case is regarding the classification of products namely "Printed Plasti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t manufactured by the applicant. To emphasize the point, he draws our attention to the samples. It is submitted that this case is squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Metagraphs Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Bombay as reported at 1996 (88) E.L.T. 630 (S.C.) and also by the decision of the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Aurangabad v. Adhunik Plastic Inds. as reported at 1998 (98) E.L .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... resented before us) may be covered under Chapter 49. 6. We find that the applicant has made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of the amount of duty and penalty involved. The application for waiver of pre-deposit of amount is allowed and recovery thereof stayed till the disposal of the appeal. (Dictated and pronounced in open Court)
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X