2008 (6) TMI 521

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. Heard both sides. Revenue filed this appeal against the impugned order passed by Commissioner (Appeals). The only contention of Revenue is that at the time of clearance of goods, the respondent accepted the loading of the value of the goods once the loading of the value of the goods is accepted by the respondent and duty has been paid without any protest they cann .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Dunlop India Ltd. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. v Union of India and Others reported in 1983 (13) E.L.T. 1566 (S.C.), held as under :- There is no estoppel in law against a party in taxation matter. If a party, in order to clear the goods for customs, has given the classification in accordance with the wishes of the authorities or even under some misappreh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X