2008 (12) TMI 509

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R.S. Srova, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : B.S.V. Murthy, Member (T)]. - The appellants were captively using some of the goods, manufactured by them and were paying Central Excise duty. It was noticed that the method adopted by them for valuation of these goods was not in accordance with the law and for the period April to September, 1998 margin of profit adopted by them was 24.45% wher .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... riginal adjudicating authority's decision was correct. As regards limitation, which was raised by the appellant, Commissioner observed that even though he found immense force in the contention, he stated that it is no more open to them to raise plea of time bar at this belated stage. 2. No one appeared for the appellant and we have heard the learned JDR on behalf of the Revenue. The Commissi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X