Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2009 (5) TMI 725

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by this common order. 2. After hearing the matters for some time, we found that no purpose would be served by merely deciding the stay and misc. applications, and allowing the appeals to remain pending, as in our considered opinion, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the matter require reconsideration by the Commissioner of Central Excise and therefore, the impugned orders are required to be set aside and matters remanded for decision afresh. In this view of the matter, we hereby allow the applications and proceed to decide the appeals without insisting for requirement of pre-deposit. 3. In appeal No. 253/09, the appellant challenges the order demanding the duty to the tune of Rs. 33,93,368/- under Section 11A(2) of Central Exc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... whereas the proceedings in relation to application for remission vests with the Commissioner and that accordingly the orders have been passed bearing in mind the jurisdiction of each of the authorities. The learned DR however, candidly admitted that the Commissioner could have called for the records from the Additional Commissioner in relation to adjudication proceedings and could have disposed of both the matters by himself. Indeed, it cannot be disputed that the Commissioner ought to have adopted such a procedure in view of specific direction by the Tribunal under order dated 10-5-06 to the effect that both the proceedings should be disposed of simultaneously. 7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it was absolutely necessary f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... without issuing show cause notice. In that connection, reliance is sought to be placed in decision of Apex Court in the matter of Sahara India (Firm) v. Commissioner of Income Tax, 2008 (226) E.L.T. 22 of the Bombay High Court in the matter of Johnson Johnson Ltd v. Dy. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports [2003 (154) E.L.T. 370] and of the Tribunal in the matter of Jeet Ram Enterprises v. CCE, Delhi-I reported in [2006 (199) E.L.T. 244]. 10. As already observed above, it cannot be disputed that in each and every case, which can ultimately result in an order prejudicial to the interest of a party, then the same should not be passed unless such a party is heard in the matter. However, we are unable to accept the contention on behalf .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... C 597] and host of other cases on the subject of natural justice, the Apex Court held that Initially, it was a general view that the rules of natural justice would apply only to judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings and not to an administrative action. However, in State of Orissa v. Binapani Dei and others, the distinction between quasi-judicial and administrative decisions was perceptively mitigated and it was held that even an administrative order or decision in matters involving civil consequences, has to be made consistently with the rules of natural justice. Since then the concept of natural justice has made great strides and is invariably read into administrative actions involving civil consequences, unless the statute, conferring p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is an added factor to justify non-requirement of issuance of show cause notice. A case for show cause notice could arise only when proceedings to the prejudice of the addressee would arise at the instances of an authority. The proceeding which commences on an application by the party, would not require any show cause notice on the subject on which application is filed, unless there is specific requirement in that regard under a statutory provision. There being no such requirement for dealing with the application for remission, question of show cause notice cannot arise. 16. For the reasons stated above, therefore the impugned orders are hereby set aside and matter remanded to the Commissioner, Allahabad to deal with the same i.e. the matt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates