Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1969 (6) TMI 35

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Tax, Orissa I.L.R. 1961 Cutt. 175.. In paragraph 8 their Lordships laid down the following test: "On the basis of those decisions one can safely find that 'vegetables' would cover only such plants which are grown in the kitchen garden and cultivated for the purpose of food. In other words vegetables shall include such plants, roots, etc. which are primarily used for the purpose of food. The description of the word 'vegetable' as appears from the authorities stated above, only means that if a particular plant or vegetable is used for the primary purpose of being served as a food, then it will be treated as a vegetable. As is well known, while giving a meaning to the word 'vegetable' we have to look to the meaning of the word as is intende .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e like potatoes, carrots, parsnips, turnips, beets, cauliflower, cabbage, celery and lettuce, usually served at dinner in, with or after the soup, fish or meats which constitute the principal part of the repast, and not, like fruits generally, as dessert." The meaning given to this passage by the Division Bench is quite different from the meaning it conveys. In the passage the principal items consist of soup, fish or meats. Other items like potatoes, carrots etc. are served at the dinner as subsidiary items. Though so served as subsidiary items, still they were construed as vegetables. Unfortunately, the Division Bench by mistake was of the impression that in order to be vegetables they must be used for the primary purpose of being served .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to be noticed that the test laid down by the Supreme Court does not refer to the use of the vegetable as primary or subsidiary for the purpose of food. Take for instance Podina (mint) or dhania (coriander). They are used for the purpose of preparation of chutney but are not used for the primary purpose of food and are used to give flavour or taste to the food. In common parlance in Orissa they are vegetables, are grown in the kitchen garden and are used for the table. judged by the Supreme Court decisions indicated above, the view taken by the Division Bench of this Court is no longer good law. As there is direct authority of the Supreme Court on the point, which is the law for the country, there is no necessity to refer the question to a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates