Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2001 (10) TMI 1100

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ated September 14, 2001, that the sale of I.V. fluid in bottles is a composite sale and that the turnover relating to the bottles have to be, by virtue of the provisions contained in Section 3(7) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, treated as the turnover relating to the I.V. fluids itself and in those circumstances, the bottles will have to be regarded as having been disposed of in a manner which would attract the levy of purchase tax, the bottles having been purchased from unregistered dealers and no tax having been paid on that purchase either by the seller or by the buyer. While so holding, this Court followed the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Premier Breweries v. State of Kerala . The purchase tax therefo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f State of Madras v. Jayaraj Nadar Sons after extracting Section 12(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 which remains in the same form even now, observed thus : "The question is whether penalty can be levied while making the assessment under Sub-section (2) of the above section merely because an incorrect return has been filed. The High Court was of the view that it is only if the assessment has to be made to the best of the judgment of the assessing authority that penalty can be levied. It seems to us that the High Court came to the correct conclusion because Sub-sections (2) and (3) have to be read together. Sub-section (2) empowers the assessing authority to assess the dealer to the best of its judgment in two events : ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to May 27, 1993 and on and after April 1, 1996 must be taken to be to, permit the levy of penalty only in case where the assessment is a best judgment assessment made on an estimate and not by relying solely on the accounts furnished by the assessee in the prescribed return. On and after April 1, 1996 an explanation has been added below Section 12(3) which requires the turnover relating to the tax assessed on the basis of the accounts of the assessee, to be disregarded, while determining the turnover on which the penalty is to be levied under Section 12(3). 8. The assessments for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95 which were assessments made on the basis of the accounts, and not based on any other material and were not estimates, ha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates