TMI Blog1985 (4) TMI 268X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment year 1972-73 was decided by the appellate authority, namely, the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial), Sales Tax, Meerut Range, Meerut, respondent No. 1, on 31st August, 1979. The petitioners made an application under section 22 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), on 2nd November, 1979. A copy of this application has been attached as annexure 2 to the writ petit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ccasions. No counter-affidavit has, however, been filed so far. Keeping in view the circumstances that inordinate delay has occurred in the disposal of the aforesaid application, we are of opinion that the writ petition deserves to be decided finally at this very stage as contemplated by the second proviso to rule 2 of Chapter XXII of the Rules of the Court. We have accordingly heard counsel for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... de out for issuing a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the application now without any further delay. In the result this writ petition succeeds and is allowed to this extent that the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial), Sales Tax, Ghaziabad, respondent No. 2, is directed to decide the aforesaid application made by the petitioner under section 22 of the Act on 2nd November, 1979, within two m ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
