TMI Blog1999 (2) TMI 626X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d. After the determination of the excess land, a notification under Section 10(1) of the Act was issued and the excess land vested in the State Government under Section 10(3) of the Act. Ten years thereafter, the appellants had filed the Writ Petition challenging the said order. The High Court was, therefore, justified in dismissing the Writ Petition summarily. - C.A. 8253 OF 1995 - - - Dated:- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n 25.2.56.On coming into force of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, the appellant No.l filed a statement under Section 5 of the Act on 4.9.76. Thereafter, on 20.9.79, the Competent Authority declared 6,100 sq.m. as vacant and excess land. A Notification to that effect and vesting of it in Government under Section 10(3) was issued on 5.5.83. Notice under Section 10(5) for taking ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d by the appellants that as no provision has been made in the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act regarding payment of compensation at market rate for acquisition of agricultural land, it is violative of the second proviso to Article 31-A(1) of the Constitution, is thoroughly misconceived as what is taken over by the State is the excess vacant land. The challenge to the order passed by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
