TMI Blog2000 (1) TMI 935X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Court dated 24th January, 1994 whereby the decree for specific performance of the agreement passed by the trial court was affirmed. On 26th June, 1977 respondent No. 2 entered into an agreement with first respondent serein, for transfer of his life interest in the property in dispute. On 29.2.79. respondent No. 2 transferred the rights in favour of the defendant-appellants who are the subsequen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... upp (4) SCC 125. At present, we are not deposed to go into this broad question as urged by the learned Attorney General. However, it is correct to this extent that long delay in delivery of judgment gives rise to unnecessary speculations in the mind of parties to a case. Moreover, the appellants whose appeals have been dismissed by the High Court may have the apprehension that the arguments rais ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent No. 2 executed a sale deed in favour of respondent No. I, and respondent No. I came in possession of the property and since then, he continues to be in possession. Under such circumstances, respondent No. I being the lawful owner, so long the decree remains intact, is entitled to continue in possession over the property in dispute. Learned Attorney General urged that, incase respondent No. I i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
