2011 (1) TMI 58

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s been rejected by the adjudicating Commissioner. Ld. Advocate states that in respect of a similar case, the appellants have been allowed such conversion vide the order of the Tribunal in the case of Cargill India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. CC,Visakhapatnam 2009 - TMI - 202101 - CESTAT, BANGALORE – order set aside and appeal allowed - C/583/2009 - - - Dated:- 13-1-2011 - Ms. JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, Dr. CHITT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Cargill India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. CC,Visakhapatnam, F.No. 738 739/2010 dated 23.12.2009 in Appeal No. C/81 185/2009. 2. Heard the Ld. SDR, Shri C. Dhanasekaran, who fairly agrees that the request of the appellants can be allowed in the light of the precedent decision of the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal cited above. 3. Taking into consideration the submissions made from both sides and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X