2011 (1) TMI 285

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Panchkula Vs. M/s H.M.T. (T.D.) Ltd. Pinjore, the question has been answered against the revenue. - 1 of 2010 (O&M) - - - Dated:- 19-1-2011 - MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, JJ. Mr. H.P.S.Ghuman, Advocate for the appellant. ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J ( Oral) . 1. Heard. The appeal is taken up for hearing as pray .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... CEA No.78 of 2009 (Commissioner of Central Excise, Panchkula Vs. M/s H.M.T. (T.D.) Ltd. Pinjore) on the same question. 4. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that the said appeal has been dismissed and the question has been answered against the revenue vide order of this Court dated 5.4.2010. 5. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed. - - TaxTMI - TMITax - Central .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X