2010 (10) TMI 408

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Bhosale and R. Ashokan, for the Respondent. [Order]. - P.C : Both these appeals are directed against the order dated 9th November, 2009, whereby the appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed and the cross-objection filed by the respondent was rejected. 2. Perused impugned order which is cryptic and unreasoned. It makes a reference to the written submissions as cross-objection. In the light of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ited by delaying the duty payment and still not paying the interest. (3)     Interest under Rule 7(4) is not attracted if differential duty paid before the date of Order passed for finalizing the assessment - decision of CESTAT in Respondent's own case - The contention of the Appellants that they have filed appeal and therefore this decision should not have been followed is no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X