TMI Blog2011 (9) TMI 343X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of constructive ownership. Moreover, Section 54F mandates that the house should be purchased by the assessee and it does not stipulate that the house should be purchased in the name of the assessee only. - decided in favour of assessee. - ITA NO. 1106 OF 2011 - - - Dated:- 27-9-2011 - SHRI A.K. SIKRI AND SHRI M.L. MEHTA, JJ. Represented by: Shri Abhishek Maratha for the Appellant. Dr. Shri Rakesh Gupta for the Respondent. JUDGMENT Shri A.K. Sikri, J The sole issue raised in this appeal is that whether the exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is extendable to the assessee for the total consideration paid by him, for the purchase of the new ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 15,000/- and claimed exemption under Section 54F of the Act for ₹ 3,18,59,276/-. 2. Ongoing through the purchase deed of the above residential house, it was noticed by the AO that the purchase deed was made jointly in the names of the assessee and his wife Smt. Manju Arora. The assessee had claimed exemption under Section 54F of the Act with reference to the whole amount invested in the said house property. The AO vide questionnaire dated 04.12.2009 asked the assessee to explain his claim of exemption under Section 54F of the Act with reference to the whole amount invested in the said house inasmuch as the property was purchased jointly with his wife. The assessee vide reply dated 15.12.2009 submitted that wife's name was only ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... these circumstances, the instant appeal is filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Act, which we have admitted on the following substantial question of law: Whether the ITAT was correct in law in granting the exemption u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to the assessee for the whole consideration of ₹ 3,28,15,000/- for the purpose of the new asset (the residential property) in the joint name of the assessee and his wife, and not to the extent of 50% share of the assessee in the new asset. 6. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, we have heard the matter finally at this stage itself and in our opinion, the question of law is to be decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Section 54F ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... new asset, on the date of transfer of the original asset; or (ii) purchases any residential house, other than the new asset, within a period of three years after the date of transfer of the original asset; or (iii) constructs any residential house, other than the new asset, within a period of three years after the date of transfer of the original asset; and (b) the income from such residential house, other than the one residential house owned on the date of transfer of the original asset, is chargeable under the head Income from house property . Explanation : For the purposes of this section, - Net consideration , in relation to the transfer of a capital asset, means the full value of the consideration received or accruin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he aforesaid facts, we are of the view that the conditions stipulated in Section 54F stand fulfilled. It would be treated as the property purchased by the assessee in his name and merely because he has included the name of his wife and the property purchased in the joint names would not make any difference. Such a conduct has to be, rather, encouraged which gives empowerment to women. There are various schemes floated by the Government itself permitting joint ownership with wife. If the view of the Assessing Officer (AO) or the contention of the Revenue is accepted, it would be a derogatory step. 10. Even when we look into the matter from another angle, facts remain that the assessee is the actual and constructive owner of the house. In ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng another house must be given exemption so far as capital gains are concerned. The word assessee must be given wide and liberal interpretation so as to include his legal heirs also. There is no warrant for giving too strict an interpretation to the word assessee as that would frustrate the object of granting exemption. 11. We also find judgments of other High Courts giving benefit of Section 54F(1) of the Act when the house of the assessee is purchased jointly with his wife. In the case of CIT v. Natarajan [2006] 287 ITR 271 (Mad.), though this case was decided in relation to Section 54 of the Act, the said Section is pari materia of Section 54F(1) of the Act. Likewise, the Punjab Haryana High Court in the case of CIT v. Gurnam Si ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
