TMI Blog2010 (3) TMI 814X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... order of the first respondent dated 3-3-2010 [2010 (18) S.T.R. 305 (Tri. - Chennai)], wherein the Tribunal directed the petitioner to deposit entire demanded amount by way of pre-deposit for entertaining the appeal. 2. A perusal of the order passed by the first respondent shows that the petitioner had not shown any financial difficulties that stand in the way of remitting the entire amount. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the purview of Section 11D as per the ratio of the judgment reported in 2008 (222) E.L.T. 216 (Tri.) - Bikash Industries, 2007 (220) E.L.T. 520 (Tri.) = 2009 (15) S.T.R. 640 (Tribunal) - SAIL Bansal Service Centre and 2008 (221) E.L.T. 583 (Tri.) - Ascent Laboratories the first respondent directed the petitioner to make the payment of the entire demanded amount. The petitioner further submits tha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rima facie case made out by the petitioner, at least for the purpose of considering pre-deposit, taking note of the interest of the Revenue, the petitioner be directed to deposit 50% of the disputed amount within a period of two weeks from today. On such payment, the Tribunal shall take up the appeal on merits and pass orders expeditiously. Till the disposal of the appeal, there shall be stay for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|