Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2011 (3) TMI 1126

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... heir contention. 2. The issue involved in this matter is the eligibility for Cenvat credit on service tax paid on outward freight paid by the Respondent for the period from 12/2005 to 3/2008. The question is whether such credit will qualify as input service within the meaning given to the expression under Rule 2 (l) (ii) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. 3. The operating part of the order of the Commissioner (Appeal) reads as under: "(i) I hereby allow credit of Rs.1,58,633/- (Rupees One Lac Fifty Eight Thousand Six Hundred Thirty Three only) to the Appellant on which the basic price is inclusive of freight and excise duty has been paid on such freight component, subject to verification. In order to facilitate scrutiny and veracity of the Ch .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... others along with interest on the said amount adjudged as payable under Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944." 4. The grievance of the department is that though the Commissioner (Appeal) has not used the word 'remand' in the order, the order amounts to remanding the matter for verification. The contention of the department is that the Commissioner (Appeal) himself should have done the verification and decided the matter.  5. The Commissioner (Appeal) has seen sample invoices and a certificate from a Chartered Accountant and prima facie verified the issues relevant to the matter and he has given a clear finding that the Respondent is eligible for the credit and thus reversed the o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re to do. If on verification the adjudicating authority finds that the conditions specified by the Commissioner (Appeal) is not satisfied in any individual case he shall issue a notice within two months as aforesaid, to the Respondent for denial of credit giving specific invoices in respect of which the principle laid down by the Commissioner (Appeal) is not satisfied and the reason why he considers that the principle is not satisfied. If no such notice is issued the order of Commissioner (Appeal) shall become final. If any such Notice is issued within the said time limit it may be decided within one month from the date on which assesse furnishes reply. But the rest of the credit shall be allowed forthwith if not already allowed. 10. The A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates