9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (2) TMI 1049X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pondent Per: M.V. Ravindran: This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Original No: 20/CEX/2008 dated 13/05/2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Nashik. 2. The brief facts arising for consideration is that the appellant herein were having a factory at Jalgaon and were engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods falling under Chapter 85 of the Central Excise ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ground that job-worker was overvaluing the goods cleared from the factory. A show-cause notice was issued to demand / reverse excess Cenvat credit so availed. The adjudicating authority after following the due process of law, confirmed the demand and imposed penalty and also levied interest. Aggrieved by such an order the appellant are before us. 3. Learned counsel could draw our attention to th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ons made by both sides, we find that the issue in this case is regarding denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant only on the ground that the duty paid by the supplier of the goods was done by overvaluing the final products. 6. It is not in dispute that the supplier in the instant case is falling under the jurisdiction of another Commissioner. It is also not in dispute that the said supplier was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
