9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (3) TMI 1194X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l 1. The appellants are in appeal along with stay application and application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. The Ld. Advocate for the appellant submits that the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service, Aurangabad passed the impugned order on 27/03/2008. The order was not self explanatory. Thereafter, they interpreted the order that no interest is payable by t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der and the order part of the impugned order is re-produced herein as under:- "Under Section 11A (1) of Central Excise Act, 1944, I confirm the demands of duties against the accesses for a period of one year prior to the date of issue of show causes for the amounts as indicated in Co.6 (a) of Annexure to this order. Assessee have agreed to pay the full amount of duties demanded in SCNs as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... interest payable and assesses should pay the same". 5. On going through the above said order, we find that it is an admitted fact that the extended period of limitation is not invocable in this case as per the order. It is coming out that the interest has been asked on the payment made by the appellants voluntarily prior to the period of limitation, which is totally confusing the impugned order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
