TMI Blog2011 (3) TMI 1392X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Commissioner who shall decided the same afresh in accordance with law keeping in mind the provisions of section 273A of the Act - Special Civil Application No. 5993 of 2001 - - - Dated:- 25-3-2011 - Harsha Devani, B.M. Trivedi, JJ. J.P. Shah for the Appellant Mauna M. Bhatt for the Respondent JUDGEMENT Harsha Devani: 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged order dated 28.3.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat, under section 273A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), whereby, he has rejected the petitioner's application for waiver of interest and penalty. 2. The facts of the case stated briefly are that in respect of the assessment ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... easons advanced by the petitioner for not filing the return in time were not reasonable and that the petitioner had already made payment of entire penalties and interest demanded by the said order and, therefore, there was nothing to waive. It was submitted that the Commissioner has failed to take into consideration the relevant factors as contemplated under section 273A of the Act and has rejected the application on extraneous grounds which are not relevant insofar as the provisions of section 273A of the Act are concerned. Referring to the provisions of section 273A of the Act, it was submitted that while making the order under section 273A of the Act the Commissioner was required to consider the relevant factors as envisaged thereunder e ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... reduce or waive penalty, etc., in certain cases" and as it stood at the relevant time, insofar as the same is relevant for the present purpose, reads thus: 273A.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Commissioner may, in his discretion, whether on his own motion or otherwise,- reduce or waive the amount of penalty imposed or imposable on a person under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 271 for failure, without reasonable cause, to furnish the return of total income which he was required to furnish under sub-section (1) of section 139; or reduce or waiver the amount of penalty imposed or imposable on a person under clause (iii) of sub-section (1) of section 271; or reduce or waive the amount of inte ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l be deemed to have made full and true disclosure of his income or of the particulars relating thereto in any case where the excess of income assessed over the income returned is of such a nature as not to attract the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 271." On plain reading of the aforesaid provision, it is apparent that the same empowers the Commissioner in his discretion, whether on his own motion or otherwise, to reduce or waive the amount of penalty imposed or imposable on a person under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 271 for failure, without reasonable cause, to furnish the return of total income which he was required to furnish under sub-section (1) of section 139. Thus, the question of waiver would ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... required to be satisfied that the assessee had prior to issue notice to him under sub-section (2) of section 139, voluntarily and in good faith made full and true disclosure of his income. In case, where reduction or waiver of interest is sought for, the Commissioner has to record satisfaction to the effect that prior to the issue of notice under section (2) of section 139, or where no such notice, has been issued and the period for the issue of such notice has expired, prior to the issue of notice under section 148, the assessee has voluntarily and in good faith made full and true disclosure of his income and has paid the tax on the income so disclosed. The Commissioner is also required to be satisfied that such person has co-operated in a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for non-consideration of the application by the Commissioner. Thus, instead of recording satisfaction or otherwise, in respect of the grounds prescribed under section 273A of the Act, the Commissioner had totally misdirected himself and decided the application on grounds that were not germane for the purpose of deciding the application under section 273A of the Act. 8. Though it is true that powers under section 273A of the Act are discretionary powers, it is equally true that powers conferred under a statute are required to be exercised in consonance with the provisions of the said statute. In the present case, as discussed hereinabove, the Commissioner instead of recording satisfaction or otherwise in respect of the grounds prescribed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
