2011 (8) TMI 875

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... epresentative (JDR), for respondent Per: S.S. Kang  Heard both sides. 2. The applicant filed the application for condoning the delay of 159 days in filing the appeal. 3. The contention of the applicant is that the adjudication order was passed on 5.6.2009 and the applicant immediately filed a writ petition in the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and thereafter the writ petition was dismissed as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rom the date on which the order sought to be appealed against is communicated. Further it is provided that the Tribunal may admit the appeal after expiry of the relevant period if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not presenting the appeal within the period. 6. In the present case, the adjudication order was passed on 5.6.2009. The appellant filed writ petition in the Hon'ble Hi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X