TMI Blog2011 (7) TMI 928X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... missioner of Customs v. Sayed Ali - 2011 (265) E.L.T. 17 (S.C.) and submit that the first respondent being the Director of Revenue Intelligence, has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter and issue the order impugned before the CESTAT - Held that: the impugned orders are set aside and the matters stand remitted to the CESTAT - 15570 , 15571 of 2011 - - - Dated:- 4-7-2011 - V.V.S. Rao and Rame ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... irst respondent in W.P. No. 15570 of 2011 may be noticed. The petitioner is availing the benefit under the Target Plus Scheme - an Export Promotion Scheme; introduced by the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09 to promote exports. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence gathered information that the petitioner obtained a certificate under the Target Plus Scheme and imported continuous cast copper rods thr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d of by the impugned order. 3. The Senior Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. S.R. Ashok, relies on Commissioner of Customs v. Sayed Ali - 2011 (265) E.L.T. 17 (S.C.) and submit that the first respondent being the Director of Revenue Intelligence, has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter and issue the order impugned before the CESTAT. The judgment of the Supreme Court, prima facie persuades us ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
