Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2012 (10) TMI 251

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") against the order dated 9.3.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench "B", Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal) in ITA No. 1230/CHD/2011, for the assessment year 2009-10, claiming the following substantial question of law:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT has erred in observing that nonissuance of form 16A to the deductee within time as required u/s 203(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was only technical and venial breach of provisions contained in Rule 31 of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 read with section 203(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 whereas the Person responsible had not taken adequate steps under Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rule .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 272A(2)(k) of the Act. The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Chandigarh vide order dated 28.1.2011 (Annexure A-1) levied penalty under Section 272A(2)(g) of the Act to the tune of Rs. 1,48,08,430/- (equal to the amount of tax deductible/ deducted at source). Against the said penalty, the respondent filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chandigarh [in short "the CIT(A)"]. The CIT(A) vide order dated 13.10.2011 (Annexure A-2) confirmed the penalty imposed under Section 272A(2)(g) of the Act and dismissed the appeal. Still dissatisfied, the assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal vide order dated 9.3.2012 (Annexure A-3) allowed the appeal and cancelled the penalty. Hence, the present ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in Form 16-A within time. Though there is no specific reference to Section 273B of the Act in the order of the Tribunal, but the Tribunal on appreciation of material came to the conclusion that the respondent had deducted the tax in time and deposited the same in the Government account but was prevented by sufficient cause in not issuing the certificate to the person from whom the tax was deducted as no PAN numbers were available with the respondent. The findings recorded by the Tribunal read as under:- "8. We have heard the rival submissions and have also perused the materials available on record. In this case, the Assessing Officer has levied the impugned penalty for the violation of the provisions of Rule 31 of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s and circumstances of the present case, we are of the view that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from issuing Certifications in Form No. 16A within period prescribed by the relevant rule and hence no penalty is leviable. Even otherwise also there was only a technical and venial breach of provisions contained in Rule 31 of the I.T. Rule, 1962 read with section 200(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, requiring the assessee to furnish a Certificate of deduction at source in Form No. 16A. The TDS was deducted at the rates prescribed by the Income Tax Department. The tax was deposited well in time in the Govt. Treasury. Thus, the assessee has fulfilled its responsibility for deduction of tax and depositing of tax. It is also apparent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Therefore, in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. CIT (supra), no penalty can be levied." 6. The said finding was not shown to be erroneous or perverse in any manner. Adverting to the judgment in Veena Theater's case (supra) referred to by the learned counsel for the revenue, it may be noticed that the High Court in that case after appreciating the facts came to the conclusion that the finding had been recorded by the Tribunal that there was no reasonable cause for not furnishing the tax deducted at source certificate which is not the case here. The said judgment, thus, does not advance the case of the revenue. 7. In view of the above, none of the pleas raised by learned counsel for th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates