TMI Blog2012 (10) TMI 416X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of this order. - Revenue shall not take coercive steps against the petitioner till the disposal of the interlocutory applications of the petitioner for recovery of the amount liable to be deposited by the petitioner - 23840 of 2011 - - - Dated:- 15-9-2011 - Goda Raghuram and N. Ravi Shankar, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : Shri Gandra Mohan Rao, Advocate, for the Petitioner. [Order per : Goda Ra ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lore Bench. Along with the appeals, the petitioner filed applications being Nos. E/SC/565 and E/SC/566 of 2011 seeking dispensing with the requirement of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and for stay of recovery of the tax liability and penalty as determined by the order under appeals. Complaining that the 3rd respondent-Tribunal has neither taken up the substantive ap ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and E/901 of 2011 expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the learned CESTAT, Bangalore Bench declines to dispense with the requirement of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Act, the petitioner shall be liable to make the pre-deposit and only thereafter the CESTAT is required to dispose of the applications for interim reli ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
