TMI Blog2012 (11) TMI 613X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Retailers Association of India V. Union of India 2011 (8) TMI 58 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT]held that:- Writ petition is disposed of directing the 8th respondent to verify the relevant records, ascertain the exact amount deposited by the petitioner and thereupon, the amount along with the accruals thereon should be paid over to the 6th respondent. This the 8th respondent shall do as expeditiously as poss ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n was to be paid by the petitioner, in terms of the agreement between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. It appears that the petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of the levy by filing writ petition (c).No.20158/2009. In that Writ petition, this court passed Ext.P1 interim order which reads thus. "Petitioner is directed to keep the amount equivalent to the service tax, that is pa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tioner, were disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court as per Ext.P3 judgment rendered on 24th February, 2012 upholding the levy but however making the realization subject to the result of the appeals that are pending before the Apex Court. 4. Petitioner, therefore says that now that the liability has been upheld as above, the amount available in deposit with the 8th respondent Bank should b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... above. Facts being as above, I see no reason why the relief sought for by the petitioner shall not be granted. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of directing the 8th respondent to verify the relevant records, ascertain the exact amount deposited by the petitioner and thereupon, the amount along with the accruals thereon should be paid over to the 6th respondent. This the 8th respond ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
