2012 (11) TMI 613

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... IMOOTTIL, SC R8 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC SRI. SATHISH NINAN, SC JUDGMENT Heard the counsel for the petitioner, standing counsel for R1 to R3 and R5 to R7 and also the learned counsel appearing for the 8th respondent. In the nature of the relief that is sought, it is unnecessary to issue notice to the 4th respondent. 2. Petitioner is taken on lease a premises belonging to the 4th respond .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ." 3. According to the petitioner, in compliance with the interim order they have so far deposited Rs.9,70,775/- in the 8th respondent Bank. It is stated that subsequently constitutional validity of the levy was upheld by the Division Bench of the Delhi High court in Home Solution Retail India Ltd. V. Union of India (2011(24) STR 129) and Bombay High court in Retailers Association of India V. Uni .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 627,6714109 9319,67132563670,67128687592,67123617880,67117 700118,67113659640 & 67111212708 maintained with it and to pay out of the total amount accrued therein, a sum of Rs.9,70,775/-(nine lakh seventy thousand seven hundred and seventy five only) to the 6th respondent. "   5. Pleading shows that deposit was made in compliance with Ext.P1 interim order. The validity of the levy has now bee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X