TMI Blog2013 (2) TMI 613X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Supreme Court did not pass such an order as it was passed on 10.2.2011 - Held that:- There appears to be an error apparent on the face of the records, as the authority could not have relied upon a Supreme Court decision which has not been pronounced on the date when the impugned order was passed by the authority. Writ petition allowed and the matter is remanded to the respondent for passing f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... counsel for the petitioner pointed out that on the date when the impugned order was passed, namely 31.1.2011, the Supreme Court did not pass such an order. On the contrary, the said order was passed by the Supreme Court on 10.2.2011. A copy of the order has also been enclosed. The said case was decided in Civil Appeal No.1090 of 2009 on 10.2.2011. 3. Therefore, there appears to be an error appa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
